Categories
Insurance National indemnity

Berkshire’s Commercial Insurance Arm Grabs Market Share

(BRK.A), (BRK.B)




Berkshire Hathaway’s continued push into commercial insurance lines in the U. S. market is grabbing market share from smaller insurers.

According to a new report by Fitch Ratings, Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Companies (BHHC) was the 10th largest U.S. commercial lines insurer in 2014 based on direct premium volume, with direct premium reaching $5.6 billion through a combination of organic growth and acquisitions.

From Regional to National

Based in Omaha, Nebraska, BHHC was originally incorporated in 1970 as Cornhusker Casualty. In 1981, the company added the Insurance Company of Iowa–an affiliated Iowa-domiciled insurance company. Through further acquisitions it grew into eight separately managed regional insurance companies located across the United States, each with its own local underwriting and management presence in its respective territories–a core value BHHC continues to embody. In the late 1990s, as it gained a national presence, the remaining six companies began operating under the shared brand identity of Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Companies.

Fitch notes that Workers compensation insurance has been a big part of Berkshire’s growth in this area, with the company becoming the seventh largest U.S. writer in 2014.

An Impact on Smaller Insurers

Fitch also reported that Berkshire’s growth could impact smaller insurers.

“Diverse commercial business segments and substantial capital resources position BRK for further market share growth that could marginalize smaller commercial lines underwriters that have less favorable market position.”

Consistently Outperforming the Industry

Berkshire’s track record in commercial lines underwriting has been very positive, and Fitch took note of that fact.

“BRK’s commercial lines’ underwriting results have consistently outperformed the property/casualty industry and most peers and loss reserve experience is historically favorable. Maintaining underwriting profitability with a greatly expanded premium base in a competitive market environment may provide future challenges.”

© 2015 David Mazor

Disclosure: David Mazor is a freelance writer focusing on Berkshire Hathaway. The author is long in Berkshire Hathaway, and this article is not a recommendation on whether to buy or sell the stock. The information contained in this article should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Categories
Insurance Special Report

Special Report: Is the Driverless Car a Threat to Auto Insurers?

(BRK.A), (BRK.B)

“Self-driving cars are a real threat to auto insurance business,” Warren Buffett said at the 2014 Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting. It was a comment that didn’t get a lot of attention at the time, but suddenly now everyone seems to be talking about self-driving cars and driverless cars.

With Google testing self-driving cars on public roads, some have touted this as a bellwether for a quickly approaching age of automation that has the driver taking the back seat.

Mercedes, BMW, Audi, and Tesla are just some of the companies that are moving ever closer to self-driving cars with a host of collision avoidance features that respond quicker and more precisely than a human operator can.

As for actually being self-driving, Mercedes-Benz wowed consumers at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas this past January with its self-driving car prototype, the F 015. Mercedes even created a video of its Blade Runner-esque vehicle driving itself to the trade show.

So, if this world is approaching, what does it mean for Berkshire Hathaway’s GEICO, or other auto insurers? Are they really dinosaurs unaware that a mega-asteroid is approaching to wipe them out?

Not So Fast

Bryan Reimer, a research scientist in the MIT AgeLab and the Associate Director of The New England University Transportation Center, doesn’t think the driver is headed for extinction just yet, or even in the near future.

“These technologies show a lot of promise, however, you are not going to get into a black box and say ‘take me somewhere’ at the consumer level,” notes Professor Reimer. “New technologies will reduce fatalities and accidents, but it won’t eliminate them.”

There’s Still a Need for the Human Operator

“Higher levels of automation in the vehicle will still have humans in a supervisory role,” Reimer adds, noting that the sophisticated auto-pilot in planes still has human operators even with planes separated by thousands of feet of airspace. “The more automation, the more skill and training you need,” professor Reimer explains, pointing out the extensive training that pilots undergo. In the case of cars, “we have no equivalent educational structure in place.”

He also adds that with the close spacing of cars, which can be in fractions of a meter, and the variability of road conditions, it make roadways “a much more dynamic environment and harder to predict.” With the enormous number of cars on the road, often coming from different directions, it makes “the speed of decision-making much tougher.”

Accidents Happen

In addition, any self-driving technology will have to coexist with human drivers for a long time to come. “If everything was automated, it would be much easier,” Reimer adds, noting that we have a tendency to both “over-trust and under-trust technology.”

Google has conceded that during its test phase it has had 14 accidents over a span of six years and 1.9 million miles, but that enviable record didn’t come in the real world conditions of New York City rush hour traffic.

As self-driving cars move into the unpredictable world of everyday traffic, accidents happen. One of those accidents happened on July 1, 2015, when one of Google’s Lexus SUV prototypes was rear-ended in Mountain View, California. The crash sent three Google employees to the hospital with symptoms of whiplash.

Eleven of the fourteen accidents Google has had were rear-end collisions brought about by non-self-driving cars, highlighting the same potential danger for self-driving and non-self-driving vehicles.

A Wide Variety of Insurable Risks

Self-driving cars won’t mean the elimination of hazards. For example, there were 250,000 flood damaged cars from Superstorm Sandy in 2012, and in 2013 there were 699,594 cars reported stolen. Add to the mix everything from trees falling on cars, to vandalism, and there are not going to be many people that want to drive their new car without fire, theft and collision insurance. There certainly will be changes in insurance needs, as changes in the ownership structures mean more car-sharing and ride-sharing scenarios. The popularity of Uber and Lyft has already seen GEICO respond with ride-sharing insurance, which launched this past February, and you can expect more policy innovations as insurers meet new consumer demands.

A Safer World that Still Needs Insurance

We live in a lot safer world than we did a hundred years ago. Commercial buildings have automated sprinkler systems and fire alarms, and homes have smoke detectors and burglar alarms, yet they both still have fires and break-ins, and they still need insurance.

It’s likely that cars and trucks will too.

(This article has been updated since it was published.)

© 2015 David Mazor

Disclosure: David Mazor is a freelance writer focusing on Berkshire Hathaway. The author is long in Berkshire Hathaway, and this article is not a recommendation on whether to buy or sell the stock. The information contained in this article should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Categories
Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Insurance

Berkshire Hathaway Increases Asia Presence with Minority Stake in IAG

(BRK.A), (BRK.B)




On the heels of Berkshire Hathaway’s recent move into the Australian insurance market, the company has announced that it has purchased a minority stake Australian insurer Insurance Australia Group Limited (IAG).

Berkshire has agreed to pay A$500 million (US$387.8 million) for 3.7% of IAG.

In addition to the ownership stake, Berkshire will receive 20% of IAG’s premiums and in exchange will pay 20% of its claims over the next 10 years, a move that right off the bat will bring Berkshire $1.78 billion of premium annually.

“Our strategic partnership with IAG will help fast-track our entry into this region,” Warren Buffett said. “We have worked with IAG for more than 15 years and over that time we’ve developed a good understanding and respect for their people.”

IAG is the parent company of a general insurance group with operations in Australia, New Zealand, Thailand and Vietnam. The company employs more than 15,000 people.

IAG’s brands include NRMA Insurance, CGU, SGIO, SGIC, Swann, WFI and Lumley Insurance (Australia); NZI, State, AMI and Lumley Insurance (New Zealand); Safety and NZI (Thailand); and AAA Assurance (Vietnam). IAG also has interests in general insurance joint ventures in Malaysia, India and China.

Standard & Poor’s has assigned a ‘Very Strong’ Insurer Financial Strength Rating of ‘AA-’ to IAG’s core operating subsidiaries.

Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company (BHSI) recently received its insurance license to provide all lines of General Business in Australia, and established operations in Sydney. Chris Colahan was named President of BHSI’s Australasia Region, and four executives from American International Group are also on board.

Non-Dilution Rights

Under a waiver granted by the Australian Securities Exchange, IAG has agreed to give non-dilution rights to Berkshire, granting the company the right to buy shares at the same price as other investors if there is an issuance of securities.

(This article has been updated with new information since it was published.)

© 2015 David Mazor

Disclosure: David Mazor is a freelance writer focusing on Berkshire Hathaway. The author is long in Berkshire Hathaway, and this article is not a recommendation on whether to buy or sell the stock. The information contained in this article should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Categories
Berkshire Hathaway Automotive Insurance

The Hidden Float Within Van Tuyl Group

(BRK.A), (BRK.B)

There’s nothing Warren Buffet loves more than float! The huge float from Berkshire Hathaway’s insurance businesses has helped the company build an equity portfolio of over $100 billion.

Here Comes More Float!

With the completion of Berkshire Hathaway’s $4.1 billion acquisition of the Van Tuyl Group (the largest privately owned auto dealership group in the U.S.), Berkshire gets an added kicker, more float.

The float comes because Van Tuyl Group (rechristened Berkshire Hathaway Automotive) owns Old United Casualty Company, which provides extended warranty services and other automotive protection plans to 1.6 million customers. And Van Tuyl also has a life insurance company, Old United Life Insurance Company.

Both companies are now owned by Berkshire Hathaway and will be split off from Berkshire Hathaway Automotive to become part of Berkshire’s wholly-owned National Indemnity Company.

While Van Tuyl has been based in Texas, Old United Casualty Company and Old United Life Insurance Company are both based in Shawnee Mission, Kansas.

Financial Strength Anybody?

There’s nothing like being owned by Berkshire to add to your financial strength, and A.M. Best Company, which issues insurance ratings, has just affirmed the financial strength ratings of A (Excellent) and the issuer credit ratings of “a+” for Old United Casualty Company and Old United Life Insurance Company. It notes that “the outlook for all ratings is stable.”

A.M. Best also noted that it “believes OUL is well-positioned at its current rating level, positive rating action could occur if potential synergies or expansion of its business profile are realized through its affiliation with Berkshire.”

How Much Float?

With 1.6 million cars protected under the extended warranty plans, and additional customers having life insurance, it’s not unreasonable to assume that the Berkshire’s $4.1 billion acquisition actually came with around a billion in insurance float.

Not a bad kicker!

© 2015 David Mazor

Disclosure: David Mazor is a freelance writer focusing on Berkshire Hathaway. The author is long in Berkshire Hathaway, and this article is not a recommendation on whether to buy or sell the stock. The information contained in this article should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.