Gold is often hailed as a reliable inflation hedge, but Warren Buffett has long challenged this view, emphasizing his preference for productive assets over non-productive ones like gold. Speaking at the 2005 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting, Buffett highlighted why he believes gold’s utility as an investment is overrated.
“Historically, people saw gold as a refuge from declining currency value,” Buffett said. “But so is a barrel of oil, an acre of land, or a piece of Coca-Cola. Assets that serve a real purpose, like See’s Candy, will retain value regardless of the currency’s condition. If the dollar loses half its value, we’d simply sell See’s Candy for double the price and maintain the same real value.”
Buffett contrasted the tangible utility of productive businesses with gold, which he sees as speculative and lacking intrinsic value. Reflecting on his father’s enthusiasm for gold in the 1940s, Buffett noted that while gold prices rose from $35 an ounce to over $400 in 65 years, the compounded returns, after storage and insurance costs, were unimpressive.
For Buffett, the key lies in owning assets that produce goods or services people will always need, regardless of economic conditions. “We wouldn’t trade ownership of productive assets for a hunk of yellow metal,” he concluded.
Hear Buffett’s full explanation
See the complete Lessons From Warren Buffett series
© 2024 David Mazor
Disclosure: David Mazor is a freelance writer focusing on Berkshire Hathaway. The author is long in Berkshire Hathaway, and this article is not a recommendation on whether to buy or sell the stock. The information contained in this article should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.