Categories
Insurance National indemnity

Berkshire Acquires Medical Liability Mutual Insurance Company

(BRK.A), (BRK.B)

If there is one thing Warren Buffett likes more than anything else it’s probably insurance float, and Berkshire Hathaway just acquired billions more of it.

Berkshire has announced that Medical Liability Mutual Insurance Company (“MLMIC”), the largest underwriter of medical professional liability insurance in New York, has entered into a definitive agreement, pending regulatory and policyholder approval, to be acquired by Berkshire’s National Indemnity Company, following the completion of the conversion of MLMIC to a stock company from a mutual company.

National Indemnity Company is a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., one of the world’s leading insurance organizations.

The transaction is expected to close in the third quarter of 2017, subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approvals.

“Good things are worth waiting for,” said Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett. “MLMIC is a gem of a company that has protected New York’s physicians, mid-level providers, hospitals and dentists like no other for over 40 years. We welcome the chance to add them to the Berkshire Hathaway family and enhance their capacity to serve these and other policyholders for many years to come.”

“We are delighted to partner with such a fine organization. MLMIC has always had strong standing and stability within the challenging New York insurance market, and the arrangement with Berkshire Hathaway will bring policyholders further peace of mind, knowing MLMIC will be able to offer an even higher level of financial security. In addition, MLMIC will be able to expand its offerings, with more customized policy limits, risk-sharing features and services to groups, facilities and other large accounts,” said MLMIC President Robert Menotti, MD.

In a letter to policyholders, Menotti said, “Berkshire Hathaway values our operations, board, staff and endorsed partners. Most importantly, Berkshire Hathaway is committed to MLMIC’s future success and its ongoing dedication to serving policyholders.”

More Float for Berkshire

As of Dec. 31, 2015, MLMIC had a policyholder surplus of $1.8 billion giving Berkshire more of the insurance float that has played a key part in the conglomerate’s growth.

© 2016 David Mazor

Disclosure: David Mazor is a freelance writer focusing on Berkshire Hathaway. The author is long in Berkshire Hathaway, and this article is not a recommendation on whether to buy or sell the stock. The information contained in this article should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Categories
Insurance

Gen Re Acquires Mortality Assessment Technology and Synthesis Analysis Patent License

(BRK.A), (BRK.B)

Gen Re, the Berkshire Hathaway-owned global life/health reinsurer, has acquired from BioSignia the Mortality Assessment Technology (MAT) and an exclusive worldwide license for “Synthesis Analysis,” a patented statistical methodology to build prediction models. By obtaining this cutting-edge technology, Gen Re seeks to deliver highly competitive reinsurance programs for the life and health insurance markets.

MAT has been available to the individual life insurance market since 2011 and has been used by carriers to support their underwriting processes. Within the reinsurance market these technologies will be first of their kind offerings.

Gen Re’s Vice President, Chief of Decision Analytics, Guizhou Hu, M.D., Ph.D., developed MAT and was the inventor of “Synthesis Analysis” in his prior role at BioSignia. He forecasts exciting possibilities for using these proprietary tools in the life and health insurance markets. “Using the unique statistical approach – Synthesis Analysis – MAT serves to better differentiate an individual’s mortality and more confidently classify the customer’s risk profile,” says Hu.

“Our aim is to improve the profitability of our client’s business,” says Gen Re’s James Greenwood, Senior Vice President, Individual Products. “Gen Re has been long respected in the industry for our innovations in underwriting substandard and elderly risks and recently has focused much of our decision analytics work in developing our new facultative programs – PURFac and Second Look. MAT will further improve our offerings and help our customers become more competitive in the market through increased placement rates.”

© 2016 David Mazor

Disclosure: David Mazor is a freelance writer focusing on Berkshire Hathaway. The author is long in Berkshire Hathaway, and this article is not a recommendation on whether to buy or sell the stock. The information contained in this article should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Categories
Commentary GEICO Insurance

Commentary: Self-Driving Auto Fatality Highlights New Era’s Need for Old Fashioned Insurance

(BRK.A), (BRK.B)

The first death caused by a self-driving car not only showed the current limits of the new technology, and also highlighted the continued need for traditional liability insurance.

While some have questioned whether self-driving cars will need to carry the traditional package of coverages, the accident shows that while self-driving cars will likely make our roads much safer, they will probably never be accident free. There are just too many variables.

Tesla Motors has stated that the May 7 accident in Williston, Florida, occurred because the Tesla Model S’s autopilot sensors did not pick up a white tractor-trailer that drove across the highway perpendicular to the vehicle.

In a statement from Tesla the company stated that, “Neither Autopilot nor the driver noticed the white side of the tractor trailer against a brightly lit sky, so the brake was not applied.”

Killed in the accident was Joshua Brown, 40, of Canton, Ohio.

In addition to Tesla, a number of automobile manufacturers, including Mercedes, BMW, and Audi are moving ever closer to self-driving cars with a host of collision avoidance features that aim to respond quicker and more precisely than a human operator can.

However, Tesla’s statement stressed the limits of its current technology.

“It is important to note that Tesla disables Autopilot by default and requires explicit acknowledgement that the system is new technology and still in a public beta phase before it can be enabled. When drivers activate Autopilot, the acknowledgment box explains, among other things, that Autopilot ‘is an assist feature that requires you to keep your hands on the steering wheel at all times,’ and that ‘you need to maintain control and responsibility for your vehicle” while using it. Additionally, every time that Autopilot is engaged, the car reminds the driver to ‘Always keep your hands on the wheel. Be prepared to take over at any time.’ The system also makes frequent checks to ensure that the driver’s hands remain on the wheel and provides visual and audible alerts if hands-on is not detected. It then gradually slows down the car until hands-on is detected again.”

The End of the Driver as We Know It?

Bryan Reimer, a research scientist in the MIT AgeLab and the Associate Director of The New England University Transportation Center, doesn’t think the driver is headed for extinction just yet, or even in the near future.

“These technologies show a lot of promise, however, you are not going to get into a black box and say ‘take me somewhere’ at the consumer level,” Professor Reimer said in 2015. “New technologies will reduce fatalities and accidents, but it won’t eliminate them.”

There’s Still a Need for the Human Operator

“Higher levels of automation in the vehicle will still have humans in a supervisory role,” Reimer adds, noting that the sophisticated auto-pilot in planes still has human operators even with planes separated by thousands of feet of airspace. “The more automation, the more skill and training you need,” professor Reimer explains, pointing out the extensive training that pilots undergo. In the case of cars, “we have no equivalent educational structure in place.”

He also adds that with the close spacing of cars, which can be in fractions of a meter, and the variability of road conditions, it make roadways “a much more dynamic environment and harder to predict.” With the enormous number of cars on the road, often coming from different directions, it makes “the speed of decision-making much tougher.”

Accidents Happen

In addition, any self-driving technology will have to coexist with human drivers for a long time to come. “If everything was automated, it would be much easier,” Reimer adds, noting that we a tendency to both “over-trust and under-trust technology.”

A Wide Variety of Insurable Risks

Self-driving cars won’t mean the elimination of hazards. For example, there were 250,000 flood damaged cars from Superstorm Sandy in 2012, and in 2013 there were 699,594 cars reported stolen. Add to the mix everything from trees falling on cars, to vandalism, and there are not going to be many people that want to drive their new car without fire, theft and collision insurance.

There certainly will be changes in insurance needs, as changes in the ownership structures mean more car-sharing and ride-sharing scenarios.

The popularity of Uber and Lyft has already seen GEICO respond with ride-sharing insurance, and you can expect more policy innovations as insurers meet new consumer demands.

A Safer World that Still Needs Insurance

We live in a lot safer world than we did a hundred years ago. Commercial buildings have automated sprinkler systems and fire alarms, and homes have smoke detectors and burglar alarms, yet they both still have fires and break-ins, and they still need insurance.

It’s likely that in 2030 your car will still need insurance too.

© 2016 David Mazor

Disclosure: David Mazor is a freelance writer focusing on Berkshire Hathaway. The author is long in Berkshire Hathaway, and this article is not a recommendation on whether to buy or sell the stock. The information contained in this article should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Categories
GEICO Insurance

GEICO Files RICO Lawsuit in Florida

(BRK.A), (BRK.B)

GEICO has sued five companies and six known individuals engaged in a complex scheme to submit hundreds of suspected fraudulent glass repair bills for payment.

In the case, Government Employees Insurance Company, et al. v. Jason Fry, et. al., filed June 9, 2016, in the US District Court for the Middle District of Florida, GEICO seeks to recover damages under the Civil RICO statutes and the Florida Consumer Protection Statutes. GEICO also seeks a declaration that any pending claims are not owed.

GEICO’s lawsuit alleges that customers’ information was taken or used without their knowledge or consent in order to create invoices for non-existent repairs, which were then submitted to GEICO. In addition to billing for services not provided, the suit alleges that GEICO was billed for services that had no repair value and were unnecessary.

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, commonly referred to as the RICO Act, is a United States federal law that provides for extended criminal penalties and a civil cause of action for acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization.

The RICO Act focuses specifically on racketeering, and it allows the leaders of a syndicate to be tried for the crimes which they ordered others to do or assisted them in doing, closing a perceived loophole that allowed a person who instructed someone else to, for example, murder, to be exempt from the trial because he did not actually commit the crime personally.

“GEICO has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to insurance fraud. Fraud against insurance companies is not a victimless crime; it hurts consumers through increased premiums and can unfairly harm the reputation of legitimate companies,” said Ryan West, GEICO’s vice president of claims. “Legislative reform in this area is long overdue.“

West went on to say that GEICO will take decisive and immediate action against any individual seeking to commit fraud, and this litigation represents a preview of further lawsuits that GEICO intends to file to protect its customers and the public from the harm caused by those who engage in fraud.

© 2016 David Mazor

Disclosure: David Mazor is a freelance writer focusing on Berkshire Hathaway. The author is long in Berkshire Hathaway, and this article is not a recommendation on whether to buy or sell the stock. The information contained in this article should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Categories
Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Insurance

Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Opens German Office

(BRK.A), (BRK.B)

Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company (BHSI) in coordination with its affiliate Berkshire Hathaway International Insurance Limited (BHIIL), has established an office in Düsseldorf, Germany, and filled key executive roles in Northern Europe.

“We are laying the foundation to provide customers throughout Europe with a full line of specialty insurance solutions, backed by BHSI’s industry-leading financial strength and underwriting and claims expertise,” said Gregor Koehler, President, Northern Europe, BHSI. “This is the beginning of our exciting journey to provide long term solutions for customers throughout the region.”

BHSI appointed the following executives to key posts in the Düsseldorf office:

• Jörg Bechert, SVP, Head of Executive and Professional Lines, Northern Europe. He was most recently Head of Strategy and Innovation at AON Germany and has almost 30 years of experience in the insurance industry.

• Ulrich Kütter, SVP, Head of Marine, Northern Europe. He joins BHSI with almost 25 years of insurance industry experience and was most recently Head of Marine, Central and Eastern Europe at Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty SE.

• Leander Metzger, SVP, Head of Property, Northern Europe. He joins BHSI with more than 20 years of insurance industry experience. Most recently he was Director, AFM at FM Insurance Company Limited’s Central European Operation. Leander is a Fellow of the Chartered Insurance Institute.

• Robert Scherf, VP, Head of Human Resources, Northern Europe. He was most recently Head of Human Resources at Catlin Europe, and brings nearly 30 years of experience to the role.

In addition, BHSI named Ute Huhmann as Executive Assistant, Northern Europe.

“This latest strategic expansion reflects BHSI’s commitment to growing both our global footprint and our worldwide capabilities,” said Peter Eastwood, President and CEO, BHSI. “We look forward to delivering sound insurance solutions for companies throughout the UK and Europe, while continuing to deepen our global team of individuals with standout capabilities and character.”

In March, BHSI announced its intention to offer a specialty insurance solution in Europe, pending regulatory approval. It named Gregor Koehler to lead the company’s efforts in Northern Europe, and Tom Bolt as President, UK and Southern Europe, BHSI.

© 2016 David Mazor

Disclosure: David Mazor is a freelance writer focusing on Berkshire Hathaway. The author is long in Berkshire Hathaway, and this article is not a recommendation on whether to buy or sell the stock. The information contained in this article should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Categories
GEICO Insurance

GEICO to Benefit From Strong Auto Insurance Growth Through 2020

(BRK.A), (BRK.B)

While some people are already worrying about what the self-driving car will do to auto insurers over the long term, the global motor vehicle insurance market is looking forward to robust growth for at least the next five years.

This growth will benefit auto insurers, including Berkshire Hathaway’s GEICO.

In Research and Markets most recent edition of the “Global Motor Vehicle Insurance Market 2016-2020” report the company is forecasting that the global motor vehicle insurance market will grow at a compound annual growth rate of 5.91% during the period 2016-2020.

The report covers the present scenario and the growth prospects of the global motor vehicle insurance market for 2016-2020. To calculate the market size, the report considers two types of end users:

• Personal insurance premiums
• Commercial insurance premiums

According to the report, a trend that is already impacting the market is the implementation of advanced analytics tools to reduce fraudulent claims. According to the National Insurance Crime Bureau (NICB), insurance fraud is the second biggest white-collar crime in the US after tax evasion. Advanced tools, such as big data analytics and geospatial analysis, are making it easier for insurance companies to reduce losses stemming from fraud claim.

The report also notes that a key growth driver is the mandate to buy insurance policies. A motor vehicle insurance covers any financial risk that can crop up while driving the vehicle. In other words, an insurance company will cover losses arising from theft, damages, or accidents – if such incidents are covered under the policy.

© 2016 David Mazor

Disclosure: David Mazor is a freelance writer focusing on Berkshire Hathaway. The author is long in Berkshire Hathaway, and this article is not a recommendation on whether to buy or sell the stock. The information contained in this article should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Categories
Insurance

Global Insurance Report Forecasts Robust Growth

(BRK.A), (BRK.B)

Berkshire Hathaway’s bevy of insurance companies could be in for a period of strong growth (helping to push up Berkshire’s profits) if its companies fall in line with the projections that Research Markets has announced in its just released report, “Global Property and Casualty Insurance Market 2016-2020.”

The Global Property and Casualty Insurance Market is forecasting strong growth with a compound annual growth rate of 5.77% during the period 2016-2020

The report covers the present scenario and the growth prospects of the Global Property and Casualty Insurance Market for 2016-2020. To calculate market size, the report considers the net premiums earned from the property and casualty market in the Americas, Asia Pacific (APAC), and Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (EMEA).

Berkshire’s profits from insurance were down in the first quarter of 2016, and Warren Buffett cited claims from hailstorms in Texas as one of the reasons.

Insurance underwriting profits dropped to $1.132 billion in the quarter, as compared with profits of $1.355 billion in the first quarter of 2015.

Berkshire has also soured on the reinsurance business as of late, noting that an increased number of players in the market has led to pricing competition.

In addition to reigning in its own reinsurance underwriting, over the last year Berkshire has aggressively cut its stake in German reinsurer Munich Re.

While Berkshire’s short-term profits from insurance may be down, the Global Property and Casualty Insurance Market forecasts a positive outlook over the next five years.

© 2016 David Mazor

Disclosure: David Mazor is a freelance writer focusing on Berkshire Hathaway. The author is long in Berkshire Hathaway, and this article is not a recommendation on whether to buy or sell the stock. The information contained in this article should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Categories
Insurance Warren Buffett

Buffett Throws Cold Water on Ajit Jain Rumors

  • (BRK.A), (BRK.B)

Two weeks ago rumors began flying that perhaps Warren Buffett had just signaled that Ajit Jain would be his successor as CEO of Berkshire Hathaway.

The rumors started when General Reinsurance Corp. Chairman and CEO Tad Montross announced that he would step down near the end of 2016.

Berkshire quickly announced that Ajit Jain, who already runs a large part of Berkshire’s reinsurance business, would add General Reinsurance to his portfolio.

Buffett watchers jumped on the news, speculating that the odds that Jain would someday take over Berkshire Hathaway had dramatically improved.

Not So Fast Says Buffett

Speaking at the 2016 Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting, Buffett threw cold water on the rumors. Buffett watchers, who hoped to divine the future of Berkshire’s leadership, got no help on their visit to the Oracle of Omaha.

Buffett noted that there are “no tea leaves to read in the fact that Ajit is supervising Gen Re from this time forward.”

While Buffett continues to emphasize that the conglomerate has a succession plan, and the Board is fully behind it, he is not going to reveal it to the public.

From his perspective, to do so would be to risk announcing a successor who might not take the job if a personal “situation” comes into play in the interim period. Buffett didn’t define that situation, but health is just one possible factor.

Speaking of health, Buffett, who at age 85 has no problem parrying five hours of questions at the annual meeting, also noted that the exact timing of succession is also an unknown. He doesn’t look to be interested in stepping down as he clearly loves what he is doing, and his recent $32.3 billion acquisition of aerospace manufacturer Precision Castparts shows he can still do it better than anyone else.

Buffett appeared to be in excellent health and spirits, and when asked if he had regrets for anything he wishes he could do over in life, he chuckled.

“I don’t think I would have started with a textile company,” he joked, referring to Berkshire Hathaway’s origins as a failing New England textile mill.

© 2016 David Mazor

Disclosure: David Mazor is a freelance writer focusing on Berkshire Hathaway. The author is long in Berkshire Hathaway, and this article is not a recommendation on whether to buy or sell the stock. The information contained in this article should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Categories
Insurance

Insurers Among Those Weighing in on FEMA’s Proposed Disaster Deductible

(BRK.A), (BRK.B)

With global climate change increasing the intensity and frequency of natural disasters, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is looking for ways to decrease the amount of money the federal government is paying out annually in disaster relief aid.

While many people see global climate change costs as a looming future problem, the reality is that disaster relief costs have already been escalating for the federal government for more than a decade.

The rise in disaster declarations has been dramatic. Between 2001 and 2014, there were an average of 132 disaster declarations annually, compared to 40 per year from 1984 to 1994

In response, one of the things FEMA developing is a proposed “Disaster Deductible,” which would change how the federal government supports states following disasters. The goal is to “incentivize mitigation strategies and promote risk-informed decision-making to build resilience, including to catastrophic events; reduce the costs of future events for both states and the federal government; and facilitate state and local government planning and budgeting for enhanced disaster response and recovery capability through greater transparency.”

The deductible would establish a predetermined level of state disaster funding before FEMA begin to provide additional assistance through the Public Assistance program following a disaster declaration.

FEMA has been seeking public comments on all aspects of this concept, and a group known as SmarterSafer, which is a diverse coalition of environmental organizations, taxpayer advocates, insurance interests, and mitigation and housing groups, have crafted a set of recommendations.

Among their comments are:

Goals for deductible– SmarterSafer urges FEMA to ensure that the goal of the deductible is reduced long term impact of disasters, reduced risk of loss from disasters, and decreased future disaster costs. While shifting some costs from the federal government to localities can help ensure states and localities have ‘skin in the game,’ and that alone provides some incentives to take actions to reduce risk, cost-shifting alone should not be the goal. SmarterSafer believes that the disaster deductible should act to incentivize mitigation and incentivize non-federal spending on preparation or resiliency. This will reduce long-term costs and losses from disasters.

Where should FEMA focus incentives– Incentives should focus on better planning and preparedness as well as increased resiliency from natural disasters. This could include many activities; however, we believe FEMA should encourage actions that will help communities in the long-term—reducing risk, damage, and the cost of response. FEMA should ensure that any activities that get credit are proven to be effective in reducing risk in the long-term. This includes better building codes and enforcement of such codes, protecting environmental buffers to storms and preserving or creating green space in risky areas, policies and investments in mitigation activities (community and individual), as well as better planning for disasters. We also believe that states and localities should be encouraged to look at reducing the financial costs of disasters, including purchasing insurance for infrastructure and public buildings. FEMA has asked whether recipients should be encouraged to set aside funding for disaster response and recovery. While it is important that states and localities be prepared for disasters, SmarterSafer does not believe rainy day funds are an efficient use of funds. However, the uses of state and local funds on planning and mitigation activities are proven to be efficient and should be encouraged.

What activities should get credit– There will be many activities that should qualify for credit under a disaster deductible; however, we believe FEMA should give the most credit to those activities that reduce risk in the long-term. Nature based approaches to mitigation, including land use decisions that lessen risk, are critical. In addition, communities should get credit for adopting freeboard standards, enforcing better building codes, insurance of infrastructure, increasing the penetration of insurance, buyouts of risky properties, adopting and utilizing the most up to date mapping/risk identification. Further, credits should not be permanent. Annual or other periodic reviews should be undertaken to ensure that the credits being given continue to be appropriate and associated with continued long-term risk reduction. As an example, if credits were given for construction of a levee to protect an existing community, those credits should be reduced if the community’s catastrophic risk rises due to increased construction behind the levee.

Additional Credits for Low-Income Communities

SmarterSafer also notes that not all communities have the same resources to recover from natural disasters, and that this disparity should be accounted for in any planned deductible.

“As FEMA looks to adopt a disaster deductible, it is important that the agency keep in mind equity issues and the different abilities and resources that communities have to take actions to reduce risk. We urge FEMA to consider giving additional credit for activities taken in lower-income areas that face disproportionate risk due to socioeconomic factors and for activities that help protect low-income households from disasters.”

© 2016 David Mazor

Disclosure: David Mazor is a freelance writer focusing on Berkshire Hathaway. The author is long in Berkshire Hathaway, and this article is not a recommendation on whether to buy or sell the stock. The information contained in this article should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Categories
Insurance

Encore! Coverage Focuses on Discontinued Products, Retroactive Limits and Liability Trigger Conversion

(BRK.A), (BRK.B)

General Star Management Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of General Reinsurance Corporation, a Berkshire Hathaway company, has launched “Encore!”, a trio of specialized product liability coverages.

The three different coverages are designed to protect manufacturers, importers and distributors from product liability exposures arising out of discontinued products, mergers or acquisitions, or other past product exposures.

The coverages include:

• Discontinued Products coverage is available on both occurrence and claims-made forms, depending on individual risk characteristics. A three year policy term is standard and can be increased to five years where eligible. With premiums that are fully earned at inception and non-adjustable, the policy offers a single aggregate for the policy term. Additional insured status for the purchasing company is an option, subject to eligibility requirements. General Star provides primary limits of up to $2,000,000; excess limits are available depending on the applicant’s risk profile.

• Retroactive Limits of Liability provides protection for a merger or acquisition scenario in which the seller has no or inadequate product liability coverage. General Star provides claims-made coverage with limits of up to $1,000,000, with a one day policy term and a customized reporting period designed to meet the requirements of the merger/acquisition. Retro dates of up to five years are available, subject to eligibility.

• Liability Trigger Conversion provides “Nose” coverage under a variety of scenarios when a business converts its liability insurance from a claims-made to an occurrence form. Protection is provided on an occurrence basis, with a Liability Trigger Conversion endorsement. Nose coverage is provided on a one year term and is renewable annually. Limits of up to $2,000,000 per occurrence are available for eligible applicants. Excess coverage will be considered on a case-by-case basis.

“We are pleased to announce this branded platform of specialized product liability coverages,” said Cole Palmer, Vice President and Casualty and Professional Division Manager. “Encore!” represents a distillation of 25 years of General Star expertise with wide ranging product liability exposures, and with the changes in product lines or ownership faced by manufacturers, importers and distributors.”

Marty Hacala, President & CEO, added, “The ‘Encore!’ brand is General Star’s latest expression of its commitment to the product liability marketplace. With unsurpassed financial stability, a veteran corps of underwriting and claims professionals, and an enduring appetite for the most challenging parts of the product liability life cycle, we are pleased to bring these strengths together under the ‘Encore!’ banner.”

© 2016 David Mazor

Disclosure: David Mazor is a freelance writer focusing on Berkshire Hathaway. The author is long in Berkshire Hathaway, and this article is not a recommendation on whether to buy or sell the stock. The information contained in this article should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.